Comparison of Manual and Automated Methods for Determining Platelet Counts in Dogs with Macrothrombocytopenia

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Comparison of Manual and Automated Methods for Determining Platelet Counts in Dogs with Macrothrombocytopenia. / Olsen, Lisbeth H.; Kristensen, Annemarie T.; Qvortrup, Karen; Pedersen, Henrik D.

In: Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2004, p. 167-170.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Olsen, LH, Kristensen, AT, Qvortrup, K & Pedersen, HD 2004, 'Comparison of Manual and Automated Methods for Determining Platelet Counts in Dogs with Macrothrombocytopenia', Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 167-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870401600215

APA

Olsen, L. H., Kristensen, A. T., Qvortrup, K., & Pedersen, H. D. (2004). Comparison of Manual and Automated Methods for Determining Platelet Counts in Dogs with Macrothrombocytopenia. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 16(2), 167-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870401600215

Vancouver

Olsen LH, Kristensen AT, Qvortrup K, Pedersen HD. Comparison of Manual and Automated Methods for Determining Platelet Counts in Dogs with Macrothrombocytopenia. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 2004;16(2):167-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870401600215

Author

Olsen, Lisbeth H. ; Kristensen, Annemarie T. ; Qvortrup, Karen ; Pedersen, Henrik D. / Comparison of Manual and Automated Methods for Determining Platelet Counts in Dogs with Macrothrombocytopenia. In: Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 2004 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 167-170.

Bibtex

@article{8483272253364d8d9eab63d01b01ae43,
title = "Comparison of Manual and Automated Methods for Determining Platelet Counts in Dogs with Macrothrombocytopenia",
abstract = "Platelet counts were performed in 43 Cavalier King Charles Spaniels (CKCS, a breed predisposed to macrothrombocytopenia) and in 10 control dogs using 3 automated systems and 3 manual methods (erythrocytelysing agents + counting chamber or evaluation of blood smear). Good correlations were found between platelet counts using all methods (all P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.71-0.85). Best correlations were found between the manual methods. Significantly larger platelets were found in CKCS with platelet count <100,000/μl when compared with control dogs and CKCS with platelet count >100,000/μl (both P < 0.0001). All platelet counts - except when made with the 2 counting chamber methods - were underestimated at platelet counts ≤100,000/μl.",
author = "Olsen, {Lisbeth H.} and Kristensen, {Annemarie T.} and Karen Qvortrup and Pedersen, {Henrik D.}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1177/104063870401600215",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "167--170",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation",
issn = "1040-6387",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Manual and Automated Methods for Determining Platelet Counts in Dogs with Macrothrombocytopenia

AU - Olsen, Lisbeth H.

AU - Kristensen, Annemarie T.

AU - Qvortrup, Karen

AU - Pedersen, Henrik D.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Platelet counts were performed in 43 Cavalier King Charles Spaniels (CKCS, a breed predisposed to macrothrombocytopenia) and in 10 control dogs using 3 automated systems and 3 manual methods (erythrocytelysing agents + counting chamber or evaluation of blood smear). Good correlations were found between platelet counts using all methods (all P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.71-0.85). Best correlations were found between the manual methods. Significantly larger platelets were found in CKCS with platelet count <100,000/μl when compared with control dogs and CKCS with platelet count >100,000/μl (both P < 0.0001). All platelet counts - except when made with the 2 counting chamber methods - were underestimated at platelet counts ≤100,000/μl.

AB - Platelet counts were performed in 43 Cavalier King Charles Spaniels (CKCS, a breed predisposed to macrothrombocytopenia) and in 10 control dogs using 3 automated systems and 3 manual methods (erythrocytelysing agents + counting chamber or evaluation of blood smear). Good correlations were found between platelet counts using all methods (all P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.71-0.85). Best correlations were found between the manual methods. Significantly larger platelets were found in CKCS with platelet count <100,000/μl when compared with control dogs and CKCS with platelet count >100,000/μl (both P < 0.0001). All platelet counts - except when made with the 2 counting chamber methods - were underestimated at platelet counts ≤100,000/μl.

U2 - 10.1177/104063870401600215

DO - 10.1177/104063870401600215

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 15053372

AN - SCOPUS:1642359327

VL - 16

SP - 167

EP - 170

JO - Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

JF - Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

SN - 1040-6387

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 226213698