Danish dog owners' use and the perceived effect of unlicensed cannabis products in dogs

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Danish dog owners' use and the perceived effect of unlicensed cannabis products in dogs. / Holst, Pernille; Kristensen, Annemarie Thuri; Arendt, Maja Louise.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 19, No. 1, e0296698, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Holst, P, Kristensen, AT & Arendt, ML 2024, 'Danish dog owners' use and the perceived effect of unlicensed cannabis products in dogs', PLoS ONE, vol. 19, no. 1, e0296698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296698

APA

Holst, P., Kristensen, A. T., & Arendt, M. L. (2024). Danish dog owners' use and the perceived effect of unlicensed cannabis products in dogs. PLoS ONE, 19(1), [e0296698]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296698

Vancouver

Holst P, Kristensen AT, Arendt ML. Danish dog owners' use and the perceived effect of unlicensed cannabis products in dogs. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(1). e0296698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296698

Author

Holst, Pernille ; Kristensen, Annemarie Thuri ; Arendt, Maja Louise. / Danish dog owners' use and the perceived effect of unlicensed cannabis products in dogs. In: PLoS ONE. 2024 ; Vol. 19, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{e263c5a791e445759f1a95bd9c422541,
title = "Danish dog owners' use and the perceived effect of unlicensed cannabis products in dogs",
abstract = "The interest in the use of medical cannabis has increased in recent years in both human and veterinary fields. In Denmark, there are no veterinary-licensed medical cannabis or cannabinoid supplements, and it is illegal to prescribe or sell cannabinoids intended for the treatment of veterinary patients. This study aimed to explore the unlicensed cannabinoid use in Danish dogs, by questioning dog owners about usage, indication for use, way of purchase, and their perceived effect of the cannabinoid treatment. An anonymous online survey was distributed via social media. The total number of respondents were 2,002, of which 38% indicated using or having administered cannabinoids to their dog. The majority of the respondents confirming the use of cannabinoids (93%) had used cannabidiol drops/oil and only few (4%) reported using Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-based products. Most owners (67%) purchased the products online. The three most common indications for use were pain alleviation, behavioural issues, and allergy. When asked about the respondent-perceived effect the majority reported a good or very good effect. The indication with the highest percentage of owner-perceived positive effect (77%) was pain alleviation. This study shows that, despite no licensed veterinary cannabinoid products being available in Denmark, dog owners do supplement their dogs with cannabinoids and the majority of these perceive that the treatment had a positive effect. This supports the need for more evidence-based knowledge in veterinary cannabinoid therapy. ",
author = "Pernille Holst and Kristensen, {Annemarie Thuri} and Arendt, {Maja Louise}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Holst et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0296698",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Danish dog owners' use and the perceived effect of unlicensed cannabis products in dogs

AU - Holst, Pernille

AU - Kristensen, Annemarie Thuri

AU - Arendt, Maja Louise

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Holst et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - The interest in the use of medical cannabis has increased in recent years in both human and veterinary fields. In Denmark, there are no veterinary-licensed medical cannabis or cannabinoid supplements, and it is illegal to prescribe or sell cannabinoids intended for the treatment of veterinary patients. This study aimed to explore the unlicensed cannabinoid use in Danish dogs, by questioning dog owners about usage, indication for use, way of purchase, and their perceived effect of the cannabinoid treatment. An anonymous online survey was distributed via social media. The total number of respondents were 2,002, of which 38% indicated using or having administered cannabinoids to their dog. The majority of the respondents confirming the use of cannabinoids (93%) had used cannabidiol drops/oil and only few (4%) reported using Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-based products. Most owners (67%) purchased the products online. The three most common indications for use were pain alleviation, behavioural issues, and allergy. When asked about the respondent-perceived effect the majority reported a good or very good effect. The indication with the highest percentage of owner-perceived positive effect (77%) was pain alleviation. This study shows that, despite no licensed veterinary cannabinoid products being available in Denmark, dog owners do supplement their dogs with cannabinoids and the majority of these perceive that the treatment had a positive effect. This supports the need for more evidence-based knowledge in veterinary cannabinoid therapy.

AB - The interest in the use of medical cannabis has increased in recent years in both human and veterinary fields. In Denmark, there are no veterinary-licensed medical cannabis or cannabinoid supplements, and it is illegal to prescribe or sell cannabinoids intended for the treatment of veterinary patients. This study aimed to explore the unlicensed cannabinoid use in Danish dogs, by questioning dog owners about usage, indication for use, way of purchase, and their perceived effect of the cannabinoid treatment. An anonymous online survey was distributed via social media. The total number of respondents were 2,002, of which 38% indicated using or having administered cannabinoids to their dog. The majority of the respondents confirming the use of cannabinoids (93%) had used cannabidiol drops/oil and only few (4%) reported using Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-based products. Most owners (67%) purchased the products online. The three most common indications for use were pain alleviation, behavioural issues, and allergy. When asked about the respondent-perceived effect the majority reported a good or very good effect. The indication with the highest percentage of owner-perceived positive effect (77%) was pain alleviation. This study shows that, despite no licensed veterinary cannabinoid products being available in Denmark, dog owners do supplement their dogs with cannabinoids and the majority of these perceive that the treatment had a positive effect. This supports the need for more evidence-based knowledge in veterinary cannabinoid therapy.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0296698

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0296698

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38295012

AN - SCOPUS:85183798988

VL - 19

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

M1 - e0296698

ER -

ID: 383880644